DC-6-63 according to the flight operating manual will burn 45,300 kg while flying the route for an hour faster at the same load. According to the latest Sandhills Global market reports covering used piston single, turboprop, and jet aircraft and piston helicopters in Sandhills marketplaces, asking values remained elevated in January and continue year-over-year growth. Photo: Vincenzo Pace | Simple Flying. The four engines of the Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet burn approximately 10 to 11 tonnes of fuel an hour when in the cruise. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. [36], Yield management allows the optimization of the load factor, benefiting the fuel efficiency, as is the air traffic management optimization. Uplift capacity range is from 34 tons to 36 tons. The 787 is also the first commercial widebody aircraft with a fuselage made of large one-piece barrel sections made from carbon composite material. As a result, how much fuel per passenger an aircraft is consuming is one of the most important . Would you know the service ceiling and the max certified altitude? [24], From 2010 to 2012, the most fuel-efficient US domestic airline was Alaska Airlines, due partly to its regional affiliate Horizon Air flying turboprops. Published by Laia and Pierre-Selim on Jul 31, 2018 10:07:00 AM. On SAS home page for instance they publish fuel burn/seat (see link). Fly shorter routes", "Efficiency Trends for New Commercial Jet Aircraft, 1960 to 2008", "Approaches to Representing Aircraft Fuel Efficiency. . The Appendix C of this ICAO document have some fuel consumption data for different aircraft at different sector length. IMHO, fuel flow is relatively easy to estimate as a function of aircraft type and weight. If an Airbus A321neo consumes 0.683 liters per second, a Boeing 747 consumes approximately 4 liters per second, or 240 liters per minute and 14,400 liters per hour. Yes but when observing an aircraft fire melting wiring, plastics, and insulation produce black smoke as well as the jet fuel. raising ticket costs to cope with the additional expenses. Fuel efficiency gains reduce the fuel carried, reducing the take-off weight for a positive feedback. Although you don't show a 200, your 747-300 number of 11,300 kg/hr (24,912 lbs/hr) is right on. The average block fuel intensity of new aircraft decreased 41% from 1970 to 2019, and that is a Are these fuel burn values an average of a trip (if yes, what is the trip length) or the burn at cruise level? An-2: 131 kg/h An-2P --- 140 kg/h An-3 200 kg/h An-12 1983 kg/h An-38-100 - 380 kg/h n-24 800 kg/h Updated for Q4 of 2022 the average price of jet fuel from a typical FBO in the United States is currently hovering around $7.50 per gallon. Log in. The A220 has been designed to be a fuel-efficient jet. However, as a guideline APU costs when compared to fixed GPU systems are from 6 (A320) to 25 (A340-500) times more expensive. What is this tube connected to a 757 for? [107] Aviation is a major potential application for new technologies such as aluminium metal foam and nanotechnology. You have everything except the diameter of the fuselage which is what I am looking for, Diameter of the fuselage: vertically 4.01 meter (158 inch); horizontally 3.76 meter (148 inch), both are exterior measurements. A subfield of fluid dynamics, aerodynamics studies the physics of a body moving through the air. You can study the effects of any engine component's performance on fuel consumption and compare the efficiency of various types of turbine engines. [28], Fuel economy in air transport comes from the fuel efficiency of the aircraft + engine model, combined with airline efficiency: seating configuration, passenger load factor and air cargo. This works out to about 852 - 941 gallons per hour (at 6.8 Lbs per gallon) For rough calculations, I consider 100 pounds per minute of flight. [8] For these reasons, the world's longest commercial flights were cancelled c.2013. 132kts would be correct for a higher weight landing160kts ways too high. Photo: Getty Images. The U.S. government has encouraged such research through grant programs, including the FAA's Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise (CLEEN) program, and NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project. Example: Boeing 737500 FOC per block hour. An airline efficiency depends on its fleet fuel burn, seating density, air cargo and passenger load factor, while operational procedures like maintenance and routing can save fuel. [2] A 88 gCO/km represents 28 g of fuel per km, or a 3.5L/100km (67mpgUS) fuel consumption. Stay informed: Sign up for our daily and weekly aviation news digests. How to react to a students panic attack in an oral exam? [82], For flights around 5,000 to 7,000nmi (9,300 to 13,000km), including transpacific flights (e.g. One includes 31 small devices that will blow jets of air on the vertical tail and the other involves non-stick coatings to help repel bugs from the leading edge of wings. Aircraft flying government officials, Helicopters - Stephen Ramsden, President - Corporate Aviation Holdings Corp. - Erik Walden, Little Hawk Logistics, LLC. Compare these figures for the A350-1000 with 777-300ER, meanwhile they are both twins with high-tech high bypass engines with the same capacity and size. [10][11] But as fuel prices have since decreased and more fuel-efficient aircraft have come into service, many ultra-long-haul routes have been reinstated or newly scheduled[12] (see Longest flights). Mutually exclusive execution using std::atomic? [29], In 2018, CO emissions totalled 918 Mt with passenger transport accounting for 81% or 744 Mt, for 8.2 trillion revenue passenger kilometres:[30] an average fuel economy of 90.7 g/RPK CO - 29 g/km of fuel (3.61L/100km[65.2mpgUS] per passenger), In 2019, Wizz Air stated a 57 g/RPK CO emissions (equivalent to 18.1 g/km of fuel, 2.27L/100km[104mpgUS] per passenger), 40% lower than IAG or Lufthansa (95 g CO/RPK - 30 g/km of fuel, 3.8L/100km[62mpgUS] per passenger), due to their business classes, lower-density seating, and flight connections.[31]. Why is the Boeing 757 undercarriage so high? After all, there is a reason that the aircraft manufacturers provide charts to calculate such things, and not hard numbers. It . [38] As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. It only takes a minute to sign up. Scrapped and to be scrapped aircraft, or museum aircraft, http://www.flywestwind.com/hangar/aircraft_files/foms/B752FOM.pdf, http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/757_23.pdf, Fuerza Aerea Argentina to receive new 757 government aircraft, developed by Pemco Aeroplex as conversion to existing 757 aircraft, combi; mixed cargo/passenger version; only one delivered to Royal Nepal Airlines, modified 200 converted to Special Freighter, extended range version; more than 1000 km increase in range, military version; 4 built for US Air Force, PW2037/RB211-535E4: 42680 liters (11276 US gallons), from 178 in 2-class to 239 passengers in all tourist, 1 front portside, 2 rear mid ships (239 passenger version), 13.59 meter (min) (44 ft 6 in) / 13.74 meter (max) (45 ft 1 in), 19.8 m (699.23 cu ft) (forward) / 27.5 m (971.15 cu ft) (rear), PW: 58440 - 59160 kg (128840 - 130440 lb), max take-off weight (PW2037 & RB211-535E4), max take-off weight (PW2040 & RB211-535E4--B), max landing weight (PW2037 & RB211-535E4), max landing weight (PW2040 & RB211-535E4-B), 11675 meter (38300 ft) / 10760 meter (35300 ft), cruising height (RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 11800 meter (38700 ft) / 10850 meter (35600 ft), 1825 meter (6000 ft) / 2360 meter (7750 ft), take-off field length (RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 1660 meter (5450 ft) / 2070 mtr (6800 ft), 1475 meter (4850 ft) / 1550 meter (5100 ft), landing field length )(RB211-535E4 / RB211-535E4-B), 1420 meter (4660 ft) / 1505 meter (4950 ft). Thanks Peter. I did add all engine types where required. Is there somewhere where you can find out the fuel burn for take off? Aircraft Cost Calculator frees you from your desktop to offer a mobile solution you can access anywhere in the world. Would like to know the condition being made when yielding such table, After analyzing the DOT statistics and some other sources, including operating manuals, it is necessary to make some corrections to the fuel burn data list. "It's with my pleasure to refer Jack Prewitt to your service, which we have found to be accurate, straightforward and of real benefit to our clients. Efficiency is increased with better aerodynamics and by reducing weight, and with improved engine BSFC and propulsive efficiency or TSFC. The Boeing 757 is known for its improved fuel efficiency and reduced noise levels, and will be phased in over time as the less fuel-efficient Boeing 727 aircraft are retired from service. [25], In 2016, over the transpacific routes, the average fuel consumption was 31 pax-km per L (3.23L/100km[73mpgUS] per passenger). Did any DOS compatibility layers exist for any UNIX-like systems before DOS started to become outmoded? No wonder passenger airlines have waved goodbye to the Queen of the Skies in favor of twinjet widebodies. just checking. Power consumption of the Boeing 747. Nowadays the fuel consumption is usually around 3 to 4 liters per passenger per 100 kilometers, which makes fuel the #1 cost for an airline (representing around 30% of total costs). Both military and civil versions, Blimps / Airships So a 10 flight would burn approximately 250,000 lbs of fuel. What sort of strategies would a medieval military use against a fantasy giant? The fuel consumption per mileor per kilometreis a more appropriate comparison for aircraft that travel at very different speeds. [15][need quotation to verify] The Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 turboprop is used for this reason as a regional airliner. They made 5 with turbojets which greatly increased the range but still far less than Concorde. anyone know the height of the fuselage from the ground? Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. [113], Last edited on 26 February 2023, at 15:25, Learn how and when to remove this template message, Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise, "CO2 emissions from commercial aviation, 2018", International Council on Clean Transportation, "Dubai 09: A320s sharklets to deliver 3.5% lower fuel burn from 2012", Why the Longest Nonstop Flights Are Ending, "SIA to drop nonstop USA flights as Airbus buys back A340s", "Last Call for the Long Haul From Singapore to Newark", "A new era of 'ultra-long-haul' aviation", "Effect of Fuel Properties on the Specific Thrust of a Ramjet Engine", "Back to the Future: Return of the Turboprop? The target for overall reduced airframe maintenance costs was 15 . In a piston engine, the decrease in pressure at higher altitudes can be mitigated by the installation of a turbocharger. A small piston-powered helicopter normally uses between 6-16 gallons of fuel per hour. min. The standard number was 25,000 lbs per hour. This 3,300 km route coincides with the real commercial route Tu-144C Moscow-Almaty, the flight time was 2 hours, trip fuel 76.5 tons, headwind 80 km / hour. Its two 11,000 . According to an industry analyst, "It [was] pretty much a fuel tanker in the air. Select from 9 different reports that ACC generates in seconds. then go to the worldwide standard: KM, meters, liters, centigrade. Smitty Former Military Veteran and Pilot for 35 Years Author has 51 answers and 13.6K answer views 9 mo Fuel consumption isn't measured use per hour like a car. Over the course of a 10-hour flight, it might burn 36,000 gallons (150,000 liters). The Boeing 757-200 freighters can carry 15 pallets on the cargo main deck. Average fuel burn of new aircraft fell 45% from 1968 to 2014, a compounded annual reduction 1.3% with a variable reduction rate. This equals approximately 14,000 gallons of fuel for a flight between New York Newark (EWR) and London Heathrow (LHR) of just over 3,000 NM. If you have a range for each period, that be cool as well. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Geometrical patterns or variable cloudings in the most vivid color.boeing 777 fuel consumption per hour"I can't consent to that," she said with painfully compressed lips. Day 4: As It Happens. NASA and Boeing flight-tested a 500lb (230kg) blended wing body (BWB) X-48B demonstrator from August 2012 to April 2013. Fuel consumption numbers depend upon a lot of factors including flight takeoff weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the like. Larger turbine-powered helicopters can use anywhere between 20 to several hundreds of gallons of fuel per hour. That means the jetliner is ultimately nearly twice as fuel-efficient as a car carrying one person. Does anyone know what is the exact surface area of the 757-200 fuselage? I hope this information will be interesting. The average level of consumption for a new car is approximately 35 miles to the gallon, which means that in order to burn 18,000 gallons of fuel, a car would have to travel more than half a million miles. Boeing 757-200: initial production passenger aircraft: Boeing 757-200 Freighter: developed by Pemco Aeroplex as conversion to existing 757 aircraft: . https://www.transportenvironment.org/si ciency.pdf, https://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/ 1-2013.pdf, https://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/ rs_cwn.htm, https://www.icao.int/environmental-prot 9_2016.pdf, http://www.saabaircraftleasing.com/prod 00_jar.pdf, http://www.sasgroup.net/en/airbus-a319- -a320a321/. Norwegian Air Shuttle was the most fuel-efficient airline on transatlantic operations in 2017, with an average fuel efficiency of 44 passenger-kilometers per liter of fuel (pax-km/L), 33% higher than the industry average. Here's the equation: 2 C 8 H 18 + 25 O 2-> 16 CO 2 +18 H 2 0. Hi Im looking for the average wing heigh if possible. Aircraft Cost Calculator enables users to determine the true operating costs of the hundreds of aircraft and helicopters in our database. The 757 is a narrow-body airliner with the normal configuration being 3 seats on either side of a single aisle. Turboprops have an optimum speed below 460 miles per hour (740 km/h). Efficiency gains were larger early in the jet age than later, with a 55-67% gain from 1960 to 1980 and a 20-26% gain from 1980 to 2000. [16][17][verification needed], Jet fuel cost and emissions reduction have renewed interest in the propfan concept for jetliners with an emphasis on engine/airframe efficiency that might come into service beyond the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350XWB. That same year, Cathay Pacific and Cathay Dragon consumed 4,571,000tonnes of fuel to transport 123,478million revenue passenger kilometers, or 37g/RPK, 25% better than in 1998: 4.63L/100km (50.8mpgUS). As the aircraft's weight decreases throughout the flight, due to fuel burn, its optimum cruising altitude increases. We thank you for your support and hope you'll join the largest aviation community on the web. This would make airlines far more attracted to buying the A220 over the Boeing 737 as the price of fuel goes up. [50], Lufthansa, when it ordered both, stated the Airbus A350-900 and the Boeing 777X-9 will consume an average of 2.9L/100km (81mpgUS) per passenger. [47], Concorde, a supersonic transport, managed about 17 passenger-miles to the Imperial gallon, which is 16.7 L/100km per passenger; similar to a business jet, but much worse than a subsonic turbofan aircraft. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries, Airport Overviews A Boeing 737-400 jet is typically used for short international flights. 3. ", 2008 Guidelines to Defra's GHG Conversion Factors: Methodology Paper for Transport Emission Factors, "Records > Aeroplane efficiency > Current", "Fuel Efficient Plane Prototype Hits Skies", "Boeing to Begin Ground Testing of X-48B Blended Wing Body Concept", "AEDC testing brings unique blended wing aircraft closer to flight", "A sharkskin coating for ships, planes and blades", "Technology Roadmap for Environmental Improvement - Fact Sheet", "When Will These Civil Aircraft Concepts Fly? Im doing a comparison between the 737-800 and the 757-200 and there is some data missing. The amount of fuel an aircraft buns per hour depends on the weight of the aircraft, its altitude and the speed it is maintaining. In 2014, MSCI ranked Ryanair as the lowest-emissions-intensity airline in its ACWI index with 75g CO2-e/revenue passenger kilometre below Easyjet at 82g, the average at 123g and Lufthansa at 132g by using high-density 189-seat Boeing 737-800s. That means that during a five-hour flight, a Boeing 747 will burn 18,000 gallons of fuel. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you. Why is there a voltage on my HDMI and coaxial cables? Currency Conversion & Imperial to Metric Units at the click of a button. 5. Activities: Guided Tours EngineSim - Engine Simulator: The lowest PIREP rate of fuel consumption was 62.5 pounds of fuel per hour. On the other side, the least efficient was British Airways at 27 pax-km/L (3.7L/100km[64mpgUS] per passenger), using fuel-inefficient Boeing 747-400s with a low density of 0.75 seat/m2 due to a high 25% premium seating, in spite of a high 82% load factor. With eight years experience in publishing and citations in publications such as CNN, Linnea brings a deep understanding of politics and future aviation tech to her stories. By 2030 hybrid-electric architectures may be ready for 100 seaters and distributed propulsion with tighter integration of airframe may enable further efficiency and emissions improvements. 21 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 When this is taken into consideration, a Boeing 747 is, in fact, burning only 0.01 gallons per person onboard for every mile that it travels. This sounds like a tremendously poor miles-per-gallon rating. 160 KIAS may exceed allowable tire rotation speed. I think GriN's post is regarding the earlier engines. To minimize fuel consumption, an aircraft should cruise close to the maximum altitude at which it can generate sufficient lift to maintain its altitude. Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin, Night Photos An aircraft weight can be reduced with light-weight materials such as titanium, carbon fiber and other composite plastics if the expense can be recouped over the aircraft's lifetime. Minimizing weight can be achieved through the airframe's configuration, materials science and construction methods. If you preorder a special airline meal (e.g. The 757-200 burn is probably around 9,500 lbs per hour. Burning a total of 2326187 pounds of fuel. What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767 . Photo: Boeing. [105][106] NASA has created a cruise efficient STOL (CESTOL) concept. [48], Newer aircraft like the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Airbus A350 and Bombardier CSeries, are 20% more fuel efficient per passenger kilometre than previous generation aircraft. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. [109] That may be true, but the problem with the TU-144 engines (certainly the early ones) was they were turbofans, not turbojets like Concordes. Hi, the interior width of the Boeing 757 website is 11ft 7in (3,53 meter). Aircraft efficiency is augmented by maximizing lift-to-drag ratio, which is attained by minimizing parasitic drag and lift-generated induced drag, the two components of aerodynamic drag. Comfort would not be affected and trials are limited to two aircraft to reduce complexity but the concept could be expanded to include more. Every second, a Boeing 747 consumes around 1 gallon of fuel (about 4 liters). As parasitic drag increases and induced drag decreases with speed, there is an optimum speed where the sum of both is minimal; this is the best glide ratio. I don't think I buy that a DC-8-63 burns less than a 707-320B. [42] Social login does not work in incognito and private browsers. [104] The BWB concept offers advantages in structural, aerodynamic and operating efficiencies over today's more-conventional fuselage-and-wing designs. [27] Real world observations on 757-200 cargo. The aircraft's maximum range is determined by the level of efficiency with which thrust can be applied to overcome the aerodynamic drag. For example, the Airbus A350 design includes a majority of light-weight composite materials. Heading the safety equipment list is the traffic collision avoidance system and enhanced ground proximity warning system that gives advance warning of possible air and ground threats. From the early stages of airplane development, the 737-600/-700/-800/-900 team strove to lower maintenance costs and give the airlines the airplane with the most competitive operating cost possible. [26] The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Apart from the two bedrooms, it has a private guest room, dining room, and a video room with cinema system. A jet aircraft uses a phenomenal amount of fuel. 4. Despite the high fuel consumption, because fuel was inexpensive in that era the higher speed resulted in favorable economical returns since crew costs and amortization of capital investment in the aircraft could be spread over more seat-miles flown per day. Boeing designed the 757 alongside and slightly behind the Boeing 767.The 767, which is a wide-bodied airliner, and the 757 share many of the same design features in . Possible fire caused by hydraulic fluid leak? This design provides greater fuel efficiency, since the whole craft produces lift, not just the wings. I think the B757 burns appreciably more fuel than an A320, in fact I believe it's around 1,000 kg/hr more at MTOW. I want to Know which cargo aircraft having maximum payload of 20000kg -30000kg of short range any one can say. It may consume 36,000 gallons of fuel during the course of a 10-hour journey (150,000 liters). Beyond single-engine taxi, electric taxiing could allow taxiing on APU power alone, with the main engines shut down, to lower the fuel burn. ", "U.S. domestic airline fuel-efficiency ranking 2017-2018", "Calculating the carbon footprint from different classes of air travel", "SAS flies slower to save costs and emissions", "Transpacific airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2016", "Aeroflot, the route to a modern airline. Parasitic drag is constituted by form drag and skin-friction drag, and grows with the square of the speed in the drag equation. The actual amount of fuel varies based on the load of the plane. ), and why my beloved 747 is clearly on the way out the door. There was also the Tu-144D with more economical turbojet Kolesov RD-36-51 without afterburner at supersonic speed, but it did not perform any commercial flight while the cruising fuel flow was about 25000 kg / h. Engines have always been the weakest point of Soviet aircraft. Are there tables of wastage rates for different fruit and veg? Large carriers, for example, have maintenance budgets in excess of $1 billion. Meanwhile, aviation is responsible for only 12% of all CO2 emissions from the transport sector, compared to 74% from road transport. Significantly more efficient than a quadjet, but still a mindboggling amount. Productivity including speed went from around 150 ASK/MJ*km/h for the 1930s DC-3 to 550 for the L-1049 in the 1950s, and from 200 for the DH-106 Comet 3 to 900 for the 1990s B737-800. For the A350-100, this is approximately 6400 kg / h for 787-10 about 5700 kg / h in normal operation for long haul. hmmm?? A reduction in airframe weight enables the use of smaller, lighter engines. In 2018 the MAX8 we see fuel costs per hour per seat over 20% better than the 737-800. It might be useful to have a "third axis" giving burn for a given range or the like. But consider that a 747 can carry as many as 568 people. Main deck P1P/PAG Each gallon of JP8 - Kerosene - or jet fuel, weighs about 6.5 pounds. Aviation's most powerful operating cost application is here. [45] In the late 2000s/early 2010s, rising fuel prices coupled with the Great Recession caused the cancellation of many ultra-long haul, non-stop flights. Lead Sustainability Journalist - With a Masters in International Relations, Linnea has combined her love for current affairs with her passion for travel to become a key member of the Simple Flying team. Every. Fuel costs for carriers can be pretty staggering - especially when taking into consideration that global jet fuel prices have gone up 123.2% compared to a year ago. The Boeing 787-8, 787-9 and 787-10 are described in the Boeing 787 Specs table at the bottom of this page which shows the detailed specifications of each of the types. I think i know how to work out how much fuel is used for an overall distance, but not sure how i would work out how much fuel is used during a cruising hour? This breaks down to $11,030.78 per hour. Compare unlimited number of aircraft side-by-side. British Airways (BA) ranked as the least fuel-efficient, falling 22% In fact, the 747-8 burns roughly like 747-400 about 10,300 kg / h but takes more passengers. The Boeing 757-300 is short-to-medium-range jetliner, launched in Sept. 2, 1996, with an order from Condor Flugdienst. An example is Singapore Airlines' former New York to Singapore flight, which could carry only 100 passengers (all business class) on the 10,300-mile (16,600km) flight. For supersonic flight, drag increases at Mach1.0 but decreases again after the transition. Sorted by: 11 The following table shows the long range cruise control data for a Boeing 737-800 (source: FCOMv1 Performance Inflight - All Engine PI.31.2): Let us consider a typical cruise at FL370 with a weight of $ 65 \, \mathrm {t} $. Organic forms entirely lost. Il-62 with early NK-8 -4 engines will burn approximately 59,000 kg of fuel on this route carrying 170 passengers. NASA indicates this configuration could gain up to 45% with advanced aerodynamics, structures and geared turbofans, but longer term suggests savings of up to 50% by 2025 and 60% by 2030 with new ultra-efficient configurations and propulsion architectures: hybrid wing body, truss-braced wing, lifting body designs, embedded engines, and boundary-layer ingestion. How many hydraulic systems does the Boeing 757 series have? Of course, the figures change as more people travel in a car, which is why carpooling and other ecologically friendly forms of commuting are often advocated. For example, even the super-fast turboprop Tu-114 on the route equivalent to LHR - JFK would have burned 45,400 kg at cruise M0.725 according to the norms of the Ministry of Aviation of the USSR. If you think filling up your car is expensive, consider the price tag for fueling an airliner for a trans-Atlantic flight.. Jet fuel for a flight from New York's John F. Kennedy Airport to London Heathrow can cost a carrier approximately $27,270, according to data from Airlines for America.The return trip is even more expensive, at approximately $33,411. The tourism industry could shift emphasis to emissions eco-efficiency in CO2 per unit of revenue or profit instead of fuel economy, favoring shorter trips and ground transportation over flying long journeys to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Based on 450 annual owner-operated hours and $7.00-per-gallon fuel cost, the BOEING 767-300ER has total variable costs of $6,329,974.50, total fixed costs of $534,150.00, and an annual budget of $6,864,124.50. Updated January 30, 2023 Written by Michael Price A Boeing 747 can hold approximately 48,400 - 57,285 gallons of jet fuel depending on the model of aircraft (model series 100 - 400). The 747-8 passenger plane can carry up to 422,000 pounds of jet fuel, or 63,034 gallons. It is more fuel-efficient to make a non-stop flight at less than this distance and to make a stop when covering a greater total distance.[7]. That translates to 0.01 gallons per person per mile for the plane. The average fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is 3.035 liters (78.5 mpg) for turbo props, 3.126 liters (76.3 mpg) for regional jets, 2.405 liters (100.5 mpg) for short haul, 2.74 liters (86.8 mpg) for medium haul, and 2.959 (80.84 mpg) liters for long haul. As well as bringing large jet ranges to a medium-sized jet, the Boeing 787 also matches the speeds of larger jets with a cruise of Mach 0.85.